Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
https://doi.org/10.1...arrow_drop_down
https://doi.org/10.1007/114990...
Part of book or chapter of book . 2005 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
DBLP
Conference object
Data sources: DBLP
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Agile Methods for Embedded Systems

Authors: Dirk Wilking;

Agile Methods for Embedded Systems

Abstract

The main goal to be answered by this Ph.D. thesis is whether there is a potential for a successful and powerful application of agile methods and related techniques to embedded systems development or not (cf. [2]). Regarding the special context of embedded system, there are some aspects to be mentioned as stated in [3]. These include the function oriented development which lead to early testing of the system, the use of target-processor simulation and the problem of hardware software co-design. The first problem being addressed is the evaluation of well known sub-techniques like refactoring, TDD, fast development cycles, short design horizon, or similar methods in the context of embedded systems. A complementary approach consists of the elaboration of underlying root causes which make agile methods appear as a sound alternative to classic techniques. For example assumptions like source code degrading over time, non-costumer oriented development, overly complex systems, and wrong development focus could be checked. A possible subdivision of the causes can be done by distinguishing effects that are generated by agile methods and effects that typically exist in embedded system engineering. This can be regarded as an alternative upside down procedure which will more likely yield a justification for agile methods in embedded system development. Finding a causation with an appropriate prioritization appears more challenging and thus will be used only to verify techniques which have a strong effect. The first step toward an assessment of agile methods has been started by executing a study during a lab course which is guided by the ideas described in [1]. Here, the students are divided into a planning group and an agile group, each developing a pre-crash system based on ultrasonic sensors. The two data collection mechanisms are a biweekly survey and a time recording log. The underlying aim is to show the influence of the planning horizon on embedded system development. This approach already sketches the main validation technique, which will be quantitative and composed of case studies and experiments. In addition, a case study with a high degree of variable control as proposed by [4] will be executed in order to guide the evaluation process to the most promising aspects of agile methods for embedded system development.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!