Reflective Reasoning in a Case-Based Reasoning Agent

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Part of book or chapter of book , Conference object , Article 01 Jan 1999Publisher:Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Authors: Miquel Sànchez-Marrè; Ulises Cortés; Javier Béjar; Ignasi R.-Roda; Manel Poch;

doi: 10.1007/10703260_9

Reflective Reasoning in a Case-Based Reasoning Agent

- Summary
- Metrics

Abstract

As a Case-Based Reasoning agent (CBR) evolves over time, and solves new problems based on previous experiences, there are some pitfalls that can appear in the problem-solving task. When those troubles arise, is the time to start some reflective reasoning tasks to overcome those problems and to improve the CBR performance. Our proposal is to extend the basic reasoning and learning cycle with some new added reflective tasks such as forgetting cases, learning new cases, updating the case library organisation or re-exploring the case library, and including other strategies such as building meta-cases.

Related Organizations

Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
Spain
University of Girona
Spain

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	3
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average