
This chapter describes the archaeological context and field methods for UMARP’s research into the Xauxa domestic economy. It begins with the site typology used to classify the region’s archaeological remains and the rationale for sampling at the levels of region, site, and residential compound. The following section discusses the surface architecture at Hatunmarca and Tunanmarca to explain the distinction made between elite and commoner residential statuses. Finally, it reflects on the relationship between archaeological units of analysis and historically described social units to provide perspective on the appropriateness of UMARP’s field program.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
