
pmid: 12477436
Fascioliasis is of well-known veterinary importance and an increasing human health problem, with reported cases in the five continents. The causative agents, Fasciola hepatica and Fasciola gigantica, present geographical distributions, which overlap in many regions of Africa and Asia, and in which the differentiation of both species is usually difficult because of the many variations in their morphological characteristics. Moreover, in humans, liver fluke classification cannot be achieved by clinical, pathological, coprological or immunological methods. The differential diagnosis between F. hepatica and F. gigantica infection is very important because of their different transmission and epidemiological characteristics. A simple and rapid PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) assay, using the common restriction enzymes Ava II and Dra II, is described to distinguish between both fasciolid species. It is based on a 618-bp-long sequence of the 28S rRNA gene recently obtained from liver fluke populations of South America, Europe and Africa. This sequence showed a few nucleotide differences between both fasciolids and no intraspecific variations within each species. This assay provides unambiguous results and may be useful for both individual subject diagnosis and epidemiological surveys of humans and animals in endemic regions of sympatry.
Fascioliasis, Sheep, Base Sequence, DNA, Helminth, Fasciola hepatica, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Fasciola, Diagnosis, Differential, Liver, RNA, Ribosomal, 28S, Animals, Cattle, Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length
Fascioliasis, Sheep, Base Sequence, DNA, Helminth, Fasciola hepatica, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Fasciola, Diagnosis, Differential, Liver, RNA, Ribosomal, 28S, Animals, Cattle, Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 139 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
