
This paper gives a couple of uniqueness theorems for certain meromorphic functions that share two values counting multiplicity (CM). Moreover, a positive answer to a question offered by \textit{F. Gross} [Complex analysis, Theory Appl. 599, 51-69 (1977; Zbl 0357.30007)] will be given. The problem by Gross reads as follows: Does there exist two finite sets \(S_1\), \(S_2\) such that two entire functions \(f\), \(g\) which satisfy \(f^{-1}(S_j)=g^{-1}(S_j)\), \(j=1,2\), counting multiplicities must be identical? Theorem 1: Let \(f\), \(g\) be two meromorphic functions such that \(f^n+a\) and \(g^n+a\) share \(0\) and \(\infty\) CM, where \(a\in \mathcal C \setminus \{0\}\) and \(n>5\) is an integer. Then \(f^n=g^n\) of \(f^ng^n=a^2\), either \(f=cg\) of \(fg=d\) for some constants \(c\), \(d\). Theorem 2 (answers the Gross' problem): Let \(f\) and \(g\) be two nonconstant entire functions, \(n>4\) be an integer, and \(a\), \(b\) be finite non-zero complex numbers such that \(a^{2n+2}\neq b^{2n}\). Set \(S_1=\{ \omega\mid\omega^n+a=0 \}\) and \(S_2=\{ \omega\mid\omega^{n+1}+b=0 \}\). If \(f^{-1}(S_j)=g^{-1}(S_j)\) for \(j=1,2\), counting multiplicities, then \(f=g\). Finally, we remark that in the proof of Theorem 1, reference to Lemma 3 should be given in a crucial phase, instead of Lemma 1.
Applied Mathematics, Analysis, Value distribution of meromorphic functions of one complex variable, Nevanlinna theory
Applied Mathematics, Analysis, Value distribution of meromorphic functions of one complex variable, Nevanlinna theory
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
