
The author studies the question when a polynomial of the form \(f(x)=x^u(x^v+1)\) with positive integers \(u,v\) induces a permutation on the finite field \(\mathbb F_q\). For \(d=3\) and \(d=5\) he gives sufficient and necessary conditions for \(f\) to be a permutation polynomial over \(\mathbb F_q\) where \(d\mid q-1\) and \(\gcd(v,q-1)=(q-1)/d\). The proof is based on Hermite's criterion for permutation polynomials. Remark: The numerous inductions in the proof of Lemma 4 can be evaded. Because of the symmetry of binomial coefficients, we have \(M(2n,3,c)=M(2n,3,2n-c)\) for all \(c\) and \(M(2n,3,c+1)=M(2n,3,c)+1\) whenever \(2n+c\equiv2\bmod 3\). With \(M(2n,3,0)+M(2n,3,1)+M(2n,3,2)=2^{2n}\), this yields Lemma 4.
Hermite's criterion, Algebra and Number Theory, Applied Mathematics, permutation polynomials over finite fields, Lucas numbers, Engineering(all), Polynomials over finite fields, Theoretical Computer Science
Hermite's criterion, Algebra and Number Theory, Applied Mathematics, permutation polynomials over finite fields, Lucas numbers, Engineering(all), Polynomials over finite fields, Theoretical Computer Science
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
