
pmid: 10924241
David Rosenthal's article is thought-provoking in many useful ways. His notion of higher order thought is certainly congenial to the notion of an object-level and a meta-level in recent formulations of metacognition (e.g., Nelson & Narens, 1990) that Rosenthal cites. However, what I wish to focus upon here, in the spirit of sharpening some of the ideas that he expressed, are a few quibbles and one major item that disappoints me about his article.
Cognition, Consciousness, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Models, Psychological, Self Psychology
Cognition, Consciousness, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Models, Psychological, Self Psychology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
