Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Biological Controlarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Biological Control
Article . 1995 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Evaluation of Alternaria eichhorniae as a Bioherbicide for Waterhyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) in Greenhouse Trials

Authors: Y.M. Shabana; R. Charudattan; M.A. Elwakil;

Evaluation of Alternaria eichhorniae as a Bioherbicide for Waterhyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) in Greenhouse Trials

Abstract

Abstract An alginate formulation of Alternaria eichhorniae (isolate Ae5) was evaluated in greenhouse trials as a bioherbicide to control waterhyacinth ( Eichhornia crassipes ). Pellet and powder formulations, the latter used in combination with hydrophilic substances, were tested. Four weeks after applying an alginate-pellet formulation of Ae5 to waterhyacinth plants in a greenhouse, the treated leaves became diseased and died, and the biomass of treated plants decreased by 29% from the initial weight. Nontreated, fungus-free plants gained weight and weighed 60% more than the fungus-treated plants after 3-4 weeks ( P = 0.05). Fungus-treated plants produced on average 5% new leaves whereas the control plants produced 81% new leaves. Water loss decreased by 31% over a 6-week period in plots containing plants treated with a powdered alginate formulation of Ae5 compared to fungus-free, waterhyacinth-containing plots. The water loss from plots without waterhyacinth (open surface) was 47% less than the loss from plots containing fungus-free, waterhyacinth plants. In a detached-leaf assay, the level of disease initiated by the powdered alginate formulation of AeB supplemented with a hydrophilic substance was higher (disease rating of >5.1) compared to the same formulation without a hydrophilic supplement (rating of 3.3). Two months after four sequential applications of the formulation supplemented with a hydrophilic polyacrylamide, disease severity on fungus-treated plants increased by 93% and the biomass (fresh weight) decreased by 89% compared to the control. Thus, A. eichhorniae curtailed waterhyacinth growth in the greenhouse, but multiple applications appear necessary to obtain a practical results in the field.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    20
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
20
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!