
Let \(X\subset {\mathbb P}(V)\) be an irreducible projective variety, where \(V\) is an \(N\) dimensional vector space over an infinite field \(K\). Then a general linear subspace \({\mathbb P}(W)\) of codimension \(\dim X+1\) will not intersect \(X\). If we start with a basis of \(V\) and write the linear equations for \(\mathbb{P}(W)\), then the equations with respect to the chosen coordinates are of the form \(\sum\lambda_{ij}X_j\) where \(\lambda_{ij}\in K\), and we can talk of the number of non-zero \(\lambda_{ij}\)'s in these equations. Of course, this is not well defined, but for example if we wrote the Plücker-coordinates, then it is. At any rate, the smallest such number we can get by choosing different \(W\) is called the complexity of \(X\). (Having a lot of zeros make \(W\) and thus \(X\) computationally simple.) This notion was introduced by \textit{D. Eisenbud} and \textit{B. Sturmfels} [J. Pure Appl. Algebra 94, No. 2, 143-157 (1994; Zbl 0807.13012)]. The authors study this concept when \(X\) is a determinantal variety -- the most ubiquitous varieties arising in computations. As one can see, this concept is closely related to the Chow form of \(X\) and the authors compute the Chow forms for certain determinantal varieties.
Chow form, Computational aspects of higher-dimensional varieties, Applied Mathematics, sparse parameters, Noether complexity, Plücker coordinates, determinantal varieties, Gröbner bases; other bases for ideals and modules (e.g., Janet and border bases), Determinantal varieties
Chow form, Computational aspects of higher-dimensional varieties, Applied Mathematics, sparse parameters, Noether complexity, Plücker coordinates, determinantal varieties, Gröbner bases; other bases for ideals and modules (e.g., Janet and border bases), Determinantal varieties
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
