
doi: 10.1002/wics.81
AbstractThis article, beyond presenting a spectrum of network reliability methods studied in the past decades, describes a scalable innovative ‘overlap technique’ to tackle large complex networks' reliability evaluation difficulties, which cannot be handled by straightforward reliability block diagramming (RBD) techniques used for the simple parallel‐series topologies. Examples are shown on how to apply the overlap algorithm to compute the ingress‐egress reliability. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate the methods discussed. (1) Static (time independent), (2) dynamic (time dependent) using a versatile Weibull distribution to represent the multiple stages of network components from infancy to useful life period and to wear‐out, and (3) multistate versions to include derated behavior beyond conventional working and nonworking states, are illustrated for calculating the directional source‐target (s‐t) reliability of complex networks by using the Java software ERBDC:Exact Reliability Block Diagramming Calculator. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.This article is categorized under:Statistical and Graphical Methods of Data Analysis > Reliability, Survivability, and Quality Control
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 24 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
