
doi: 10.1002/wdev.325
pmid: 29944210
Xenopus gastrulation movements are in large part based on the rearrangement of cells by differential cell‐on‐cell migration within multilayered tissues. Different patterns of migration‐based cell intercalation drive endoderm and mesoderm internalization and their positioning along their prospective body axes. C‐cadherin, fibronectin, integrins, and focal contact components are expressed in all gastrula cells and play putative roles in cell‐on‐cell migration, but their actual functions in this respect are not yet understood. The gastrula can be subdivided into two motility domains, and in the vegetal, migratory domain, two modes of cell migration are discerned. Vegetal endoderm cells show ingression‐type migration, a variant of amoeboid migration characterized by the lack of locomotory protrusions and by macropinocytosis as a mechanism of trailing edge resorption. Mesendoderm and prechordal mesoderm cells use lamellipodia in a mesenchymal mode of migration. Gastrula cell motility can be dissected into traits, such as cell polarity, adhesion, mobility, or protrusive activity, which are controlled separately yet in complex, combinatorial ways. Cells can instantaneously switch between different combinations of traits, showing plasticity as they respond to substratum properties.This article is categorized under: Early Embryonic Development > Gastrulation and Neurulation
Integrins, Embryo, Nonmammalian, Endoderm, Gastrulation, Cell Polarity, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Gastrula, Xenopus Proteins, Cadherins, Fibronectins, Mesoderm, Xenopus laevis, Cell Movement, Ectoderm, Animals, Pseudopodia, Body Patterning, Signal Transduction
Integrins, Embryo, Nonmammalian, Endoderm, Gastrulation, Cell Polarity, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Gastrula, Xenopus Proteins, Cadherins, Fibronectins, Mesoderm, Xenopus laevis, Cell Movement, Ectoderm, Animals, Pseudopodia, Body Patterning, Signal Transduction
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 24 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
