Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Transactions of the ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Transactions of the American Fisheries Society
Article . 2022 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Trophic Ecology and Resource Partitioning of Common Snook and Mexican Snook in the Usumacinta River Delta

Authors: Edgar Abraham Aragón‐Flores; Rocío Rodiles‐Hernández; Miriam Soria‐Barreto; Carmen G. Montaña; María Mercedes Castillo; Matteo Cazzanelli;

Trophic Ecology and Resource Partitioning of Common Snook and Mexican Snook in the Usumacinta River Delta

Abstract

AbstractCoexisting species often develop resource‐partitioning mechanisms to reduce their direct competition and optimize energy harvesting. Common Snook Centropomus undecimalis and Mexican Snook C. poeyi are carnivorous fish that coexist in estuaries of the Usumacinta River delta, in the southern Gulf of Mexico, and play an important role for fisheries and economy in this region. We analyzed spatial, temporal, and ontogenetic variability in trophic dynamics and distribution of Common and Mexican snooks. To identify patterns of trophic resource partitioning, we analyzed stomach content and stable isotopes (δ13C, δ15N) of the two species. Fifty‐one prey items were identified, with fish remains being the most abundant component (>35%). The two snook species appeared to be specialized carnivores of the third or fourth trophic level. Diet comparison indicated significant differences among species: Common Snook presented a higher proportion of fish from the families Engraulidae, Clupeidae, and Elopidae, while Mexican Snook consumed a higher fraction of fish from the families Cichlidae, Poeciliidae, and Loricariidae. The diet also presented significant variations between size‐classes. Small‐sized (<350 mm SL) Common Snook showed significantly higher reliance on invertebrates than large‐sized fish (>500 mm SL). Medium‐sized (351–499 mm SL) Mexican Snook consumed a higher proportion of Poeciliidae fish than small‐sized or large‐sized fish. The diet of the two snook species also presented important differences among seasons and sites. Trophic niche overlap between Common and Mexican snooks varied among systems, with higher overlap in the Pom−Atasta system than in the Palizada River. This study indicates that Common Snook and Mexican Snook have developed strategies for spatial partitioning of resources that favor their coexistence in the Usumacinta River delta.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!