
Covariate balance is one of the fundamental issues in designing experiments for treatment comparisons, especially in randomized clinical trials. In this article, we introduce a new class of covariate‐adaptive procedures based on the Simulated Annealing algorithm aimed at balancing the allocations of two competing treatments across a set of pre‐specified covariates. Due to the nature of the simulated annealing, these designs are intrinsically randomized, thus completely unpredictable, and very flexible: they can manage both quantitative and qualitative factors and be implemented in a static version as well as sequentially. The properties of the suggested proposal are described, showing a significant improvement in terms of covariate balance and inferential accuracy with respect to all the other procedures proposed in the literature. An illustrative example based on real data is also discussed.
covariate-adaptive procedures, loss of information, mahalanobis distance, rerandomization, treatment comparisons, treatment comparisons, covariate-adaptive procedures, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, Random Allocation, Research Design, Humans, loss of information, Computer Simulation, Mahalanobis distance, rerandomization
covariate-adaptive procedures, loss of information, mahalanobis distance, rerandomization, treatment comparisons, treatment comparisons, covariate-adaptive procedures, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, Random Allocation, Research Design, Humans, loss of information, Computer Simulation, Mahalanobis distance, rerandomization
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
