
doi: 10.1002/sim.7968
pmid: 30225994
In this paper, we propose a large‐scale multiple testing procedure to find the significant sub‐areas between two samples of curves automatically. The procedure is optimal in that it controls the directional false discovery rate at any specified level on a continuum asymptotically. By introducing a nonparametric Gaussian process regression model for the two‐sided multiple test, the procedure is computationally inexpensive. It can cope with problems with multidimensional covariates and accommodate different sampling designs across the samples. We further propose the significant curve/surface, giving an insight on dynamic significant differences between two curves. Simulation studies demonstrate that the proposed procedure enjoys superior performance with strong power and good directional error control. The procedure is also illustrated with the application to two executive function studies in hemiplegia.
Models, Statistical, Normal Distribution, Hemiplegia, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, Executive Function, Treatment Outcome, type III error, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, significant areas, False Positive Reactions, false discovery rate, Gaussian process regression model, functional data
Models, Statistical, Normal Distribution, Hemiplegia, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, Executive Function, Treatment Outcome, type III error, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, significant areas, False Positive Reactions, false discovery rate, Gaussian process regression model, functional data
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
