
doi: 10.1002/sim.7456
pmid: 29067731
A major challenge when monitoring risks in socially deprived areas of under developed countries is that economic, epidemiological, and social data are typically underreported. Thus, statistical models that do not take the data quality into account will produce biased estimates. To deal with this problem, counts in suspected regions are usually approached as censored information. The censored Poisson model can be considered, but all censored regions must be precisely known a priori, which is not a reasonable assumption in most practical situations. We introduce the random‐censoring Poisson model (RCPM) which accounts for the uncertainty about both the count and the data reporting processes. Consequently, for each region, we will be able to estimate the relative risk for the event of interest as well as the censoring probability. To facilitate the posterior sampling process, we propose a Markov chain Monte Carlo scheme based on the data augmentation technique. We run a simulation study comparing the proposed RCPM with 2 competitive models. Different scenarios are considered. RCPM and censored Poisson model are applied to account for potential underreporting of early neonatal mortality counts in regions of Minas Gerais State, Brazil, where data quality is known to be poor.
Bayesian inference, Biostatistics, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, censoring, Infant Mortality, Humans, Computer Simulation, Poisson Distribution, underreporting, Probability, Models, Statistical, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Bayes Theorem, Markov Chains, infant mortality, Monte Carlo Method, Algorithms, Brazil, data augmentation
Bayesian inference, Biostatistics, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, censoring, Infant Mortality, Humans, Computer Simulation, Poisson Distribution, underreporting, Probability, Models, Statistical, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Bayes Theorem, Markov Chains, infant mortality, Monte Carlo Method, Algorithms, Brazil, data augmentation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 24 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
