
Popular approaches to spatial cluster detection, such as the spatial scan statistic, are defined in terms of the responses. Here, we consider a varying‐coefficient regression and spatial clusters in the regression coefficients. For varying‐coefficient regression, such as the geographically weighted regression, different regression coefficients are obtained for different spatial units. It is often of interest to the practitioners to identify clusters of spatial units with distinct patterns in a regression coefficient, but there is no formal statistical methodology for that. Rather, cluster identification is often ad‐hoc such as by eyeballing the map of fitted regression coefficients and discerning patterns. In this paper, we develop new methodology for spatial cluster detection in the regression setting based on hypotheses testing. We evaluate our methods in terms of power and coverages for true clusters via simulation studies. For illustration, our methodology is applied to a cancer mortality dataset. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Models, Statistical, spatial cluster detection, geographically weighted regression, Statistics as Topic, Southeastern United States, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, spatial scan statistic, varying coefficient regression, Neoplasms, hypothesis testing, Cluster Analysis, Humans, Monte Carlo Method, Spatial Regression
Models, Statistical, spatial cluster detection, geographically weighted regression, Statistics as Topic, Southeastern United States, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, spatial scan statistic, varying coefficient regression, Neoplasms, hypothesis testing, Cluster Analysis, Humans, Monte Carlo Method, Spatial Regression
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 32 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
