Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This paper presents a new goodness‐of‐fit test for an ordered stereotype model used for an ordinal response variable. The proposed test is based on the well‐known Hosmer–Lemeshow test and its version for the proportional odds regression model. The latter test statistic is calculated from a grouping scheme assuming that the levels of the ordinal response are equally spaced which might be not true. One of the main advantages of the ordered stereotype model is that it allows us to determine a new uneven spacing of the ordinal response categories, dictated by the data. The proposed test takes the use of this new adjusted spacing to partition data. A simulation study shows good performance of the proposed test under a variety of scenarios. Finally, the results of the application in two examples are presented. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Goodness-of-fit tests, Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Matemàtiques i estadística, ordered stereotype model, Uneven spacing, Hosmer-Lemeshow test, Goodness-of-fit, uneven spacing, Tests d' (Estadística), Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, ordinal data, Ajustament, Ajustament, Tests d' (Estadística), Logistic Models, Medical statistics, Ordered stereotype model, goodnes-of-fit, Humans, Ordinal data, Hosmer–Lemeshow test, Estadística mèdica
Goodness-of-fit tests, Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Matemàtiques i estadística, ordered stereotype model, Uneven spacing, Hosmer-Lemeshow test, Goodness-of-fit, uneven spacing, Tests d' (Estadística), Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, ordinal data, Ajustament, Ajustament, Tests d' (Estadística), Logistic Models, Medical statistics, Ordered stereotype model, goodnes-of-fit, Humans, Ordinal data, Hosmer–Lemeshow test, Estadística mèdica
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 29 | |
| downloads | 81 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts