
doi: 10.1002/sim.6979
pmid: 27139501
Marginal structural Cox models are used for quantifying marginal treatment effects on outcome event hazard function. Such models are estimated using inverse probability of treatment and censoring (IPTC) weighting, which properly accounts for the impact of time‐dependent confounders, avoiding conditioning on factors on the causal pathway. To estimate the IPTC weights, the treatment assignment mechanism is conventionally modeled in discrete time. While this is natural in situations where treatment information is recorded at scheduled follow‐up visits, in other contexts, the events specifying the treatment history can be modeled in continuous time using the tools of event history analysis. This is particularly the case for treatment procedures, such as surgeries. In this paper, we propose a novel approach for flexible parametric estimation of continuous‐time IPTC weights and illustrate it in assessing the relationship between metastasectomy and mortality in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Male, Models, Statistical, event history analysis, Breast Neoplasms, Kidney Neoplasms, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, case-base sampling, Treatment Outcome, continuous-time inverse probability of treatment and censoring weighting, Humans, Female, Carcinoma, Renal Cell, marginal structural Cox models, Probability, Proportional Hazards Models
Male, Models, Statistical, event history analysis, Breast Neoplasms, Kidney Neoplasms, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, case-base sampling, Treatment Outcome, continuous-time inverse probability of treatment and censoring weighting, Humans, Female, Carcinoma, Renal Cell, marginal structural Cox models, Probability, Proportional Hazards Models
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
