
The mean residual life function provides a clear and simple summary of the effect of a treatment or a risk factor in units of time, avoiding hazard ratios or probability scales, which require careful interpretation. Estimation of the mean residual life is complicated by the upper tail of the survival distribution not being observed as, for example, patients may still be alive at the end of the follow‐up period. Various approaches have been developed to estimate the mean residual life in the presence of such right censoring. In this work, a novel semi‐parametric method that combines existing non‐parametric methods and an extreme value tail model is presented, where the limited sample information in the tail (prior to study termination) is used to estimate the upper tail behaviour. This approach will be demonstrated with simulated and real‐life examples. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Male, Time Factors, extreme value theory, quality-adjusted survival, Breast Neoplasms, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases, Statistics, Nonparametric, generalised pareto distribution, survival analysis, estimator, Double-Blind Method, Risk Factors, Humans, Computer Simulation, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Externally hosted open access publications with University of Galway authors, Leukemia, mean residual life, Prognosis, Survival Analysis, Female, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Ireland
Male, Time Factors, extreme value theory, quality-adjusted survival, Breast Neoplasms, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases, Statistics, Nonparametric, generalised pareto distribution, survival analysis, estimator, Double-Blind Method, Risk Factors, Humans, Computer Simulation, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Externally hosted open access publications with University of Galway authors, Leukemia, mean residual life, Prognosis, Survival Analysis, Female, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Ireland
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
