
Prognosis plays a pivotal role in patient management and trial design. A useful prognostic model should correctly identify important risk factors and estimate their effects. In this article, we discuss several challenges in selecting prognostic factors and estimating their effects using the Cox proportional hazards model. Although a flexible semiparametric form, the Cox's model is not entirely exempt from model misspecification. To minimize possible misspecification, instead of imposing traditional linear assumption, flexible modeling techniques have been proposed to accommodate the nonlinear effect. We first review several existing nonparametric estimation and selection procedures and then present a numerical study to compare the performance between parametric and nonparametric procedures. We demonstrate the impact of model misspecification on variable selection and model prediction using a simulation study and an example from a phase III trial in prostate cancer. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Male, model selection, Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent, smoothing splines, Prostatic Neoplasms, LASSO, Prostate-Specific Antigen, Prognosis, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic, Cox model, Humans, COSSO, Computer Simulation, Proportional Hazards Models
Male, model selection, Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent, smoothing splines, Prostatic Neoplasms, LASSO, Prostate-Specific Antigen, Prognosis, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic, Cox model, Humans, COSSO, Computer Simulation, Proportional Hazards Models
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
