
doi: 10.1002/sim.5847
pmid: 23686358
Methods for controlling the type‐1 error of an adaptive group sequential trial were developed in seminal papers by Cui, Hung, and Wang (Biometrics, 1999), Lehmacher and Wassmer (Biometrics, 1999), and Müller and Schäfer (Biometrics, 2001). However, corresponding solutions for the equally important and related problem of parameter estimation at the end of the adaptive trial have not been completely satisfactory. In this paper, a method is provided for computing a two‐sided confidence interval having exact coverage, along with a point estimate that is median unbiased for the primary efficacy parameter in a two‐arm adaptive group sequential design. The possible adaptations are not only confined to sample size alterations but also include data‐dependent changes in the number and spacing of interim looks and changes in the error spending function. The procedure is based on mapping the final test statistic obtained in the modified trial into a corresponding backward image in the original trial. This is an advance on previously available methods, which either produced conservative coverage and no point estimates or provided exact coverage for one‐sided intervals only. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
estimation in adaptive design, group sequential estimation, Deep Brain Stimulation, Parkinson Disease, exact adaptive confidence intervals, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, Research Design, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Sample Size, Confidence Intervals, Quality of Life, Humans, Computer Simulation, adaptive median unbiased estimates
estimation in adaptive design, group sequential estimation, Deep Brain Stimulation, Parkinson Disease, exact adaptive confidence intervals, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, Research Design, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Sample Size, Confidence Intervals, Quality of Life, Humans, Computer Simulation, adaptive median unbiased estimates
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 30 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
