
Multivariate meta‐analysis allows the joint synthesis of effect estimates based on multiple outcomes from multiple studies, accounting for the potential correlations among them. However, standard methods for multivariate meta‐analysis for multiple outcomes are restricted to problems where the within‐study correlation is known or where individual participant data are available. This paper proposes an approach to approximating the within‐study covariances based on information about likely correlations between underlying outcomes. We developed methods for both continuous and dichotomous data and for combinations of the two types. An application to a meta‐analysis of treatments for stroke illustrates the use of the approximated covariance in multivariate meta‐analysis with correlated outcomes. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
correlated outcomes, Models, Statistical, 610, Cardiovascular Agents, multivariate meta-analysis, within-study correlation, Biostatistics, 310, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, nested events, Stroke, Treatment Outcome, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Multivariate Analysis, Odds Ratio, Humans, delta method, Research Articles, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
correlated outcomes, Models, Statistical, 610, Cardiovascular Agents, multivariate meta-analysis, within-study correlation, Biostatistics, 310, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, nested events, Stroke, Treatment Outcome, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Multivariate Analysis, Odds Ratio, Humans, delta method, Research Articles, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 95 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
