
pmid: 7973201
AbstractWe consider feed‐forward neural nets and their relation to regression models for survival data. We show how the back‐propagation algorithm may be used to obtain maximum likelihood estimates in certain standard regression models for survival data, as well as in various generalizations of these. Examples concerning malignant melanoma and post‐partum amenorrhoea during lactation are used as illustration. We conclude that although problems with the substantial number of parameters and their interpretation remain, the feed‐forward neural network models are flexible extensions to the standard regression models and thereby candidates for use in prediction and exploratory analyses in larger data sets.
Male, Likelihood Functions, Skin Neoplasms, Biopsy, Postpartum Period, Survival Analysis, Risk Factors, Humans, Lactation, Regression Analysis, Female, Neural Networks, Computer, Amenorrhea, Melanoma, Algorithms, Proportional Hazards Models
Male, Likelihood Functions, Skin Neoplasms, Biopsy, Postpartum Period, Survival Analysis, Risk Factors, Humans, Lactation, Regression Analysis, Female, Neural Networks, Computer, Amenorrhea, Melanoma, Algorithms, Proportional Hazards Models
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 91 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
