Methods for comparing cumulative hazard functions in a semi‐proportional hazard model
Copyright policy )Methods for comparing cumulative hazard functions in a semi‐proportional hazard model
AbstractGraphical methods based on the analysis of differences between log cumulative hazard functions are considered for a two‐group semi‐proportional hazard model which allows for interaction between treatments and covariates. Confidence procedures and test statistics that can be used to test for interaction and for main effects are developed. Their use is illustrated by applying them to the analysis of kidney transplant data from the University of California, San Francisco.
- Presbyterian Medical Center Korea (Republic of)
- University of California, Los Angeles United States
- University of California, San Francisco United States
- University of California, Berkeley United States
Azathioprine, Graft Survival, Confidence Intervals, Cyclosporine, Humans, Prednisone, Drug Therapy, Combination, Kidney Transplantation, Proportional Hazards Models
Azathioprine, Graft Survival, Confidence Intervals, Cyclosporine, Humans, Prednisone, Drug Therapy, Combination, Kidney Transplantation, Proportional Hazards Models
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).14 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 10% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!