
pmid: 1925173
AbstractThis paper concerns a linear mixed‐effects repeated measures model in the analysis of a large data set with over 17,000 observations in a longitudinal study of pure‐tone hearing perception in the elderly. The repeated measurements are described by fixed and random components in the model. The fixed effects include the age at entry, time of follow‐up, a quadratic component in natural logarithm of frequency, a component to allow for participants with hearing impairments, as well as interaction terms between age and frequency and between impairment and frequency. The random factors include a term for subject, a time component and a frequency component. The analysis shows that hearing impaired individuals have similar patterns of hearing loss over time but, on average, have higher hearing thresholds than normal individuals. Estimation of the random effects in the model by restricted maximum likelihood (REML) using the Newton‐Raphson method made possible the analysis of this large data set with speed and efficiency.
Aged, 80 and over, Male, Aging, Analysis of Variance, Likelihood Functions, Auditory Threshold, Presbycusis, Models, Biological, Cross-Sectional Studies, Reference Values, Audiometry, Pure-Tone, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Aged
Aged, 80 and over, Male, Aging, Analysis of Variance, Likelihood Functions, Auditory Threshold, Presbycusis, Models, Biological, Cross-Sectional Studies, Reference Values, Audiometry, Pure-Tone, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 27 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
