
pmid: 3201038
AbstractI discuss the impact of individual heterogeneity in survival analysis. It is well known that this phenomenon may distort what is observed. A general class of mixing (or frailty) distributions is applied, extending a model of Hougaard. The extension allows part of the population to be non‐susceptible, and contains the traditional gamma distribution as a special case. I consider the mixing of both a constant and a Weibull individual rate, and also discuss the comparison of rates from two populations. A number of practical examples are mentioned. Finally, I analyse two data sets, the main one containing data from the Norwegian Cancer Registry on the survival of breast cancer patients. The statistical analysis is of necessity speculative, but may still provide some insight.
Adult, Risk, Leukemia, Statistics as Topic, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Breast Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Actuarial Analysis, Child, Preschool, Humans, Female, Child, Probability
Adult, Risk, Leukemia, Statistics as Topic, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Breast Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Actuarial Analysis, Child, Preschool, Humans, Female, Child, Probability
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 267 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
