
pmid: 3264613
AbstractThis paper demonstrates a methodology for examining whether neighbourhood stratification lessens the confounding bias of some specific risk‐factor/disease associations in analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey II (NHANES II). The fortuitous clustering of the sample design of NHANES allows us to estimate risk‐factor/disease associations with and without controlling for neighbourhood effects on the same population. We briefly discuss the implications of this methodology for neighbourhood matching in case‐control studies.
Adult, Male, Models, Statistical, Adolescent, Infant, Blood Pressure, Middle Aged, Social Environment, Sampling Studies, Nutrition Disorders, Calcium, Dietary, Cross-Sectional Studies, Lead, Risk Factors, Child, Preschool, Humans, Female, Child, Aged, Probability
Adult, Male, Models, Statistical, Adolescent, Infant, Blood Pressure, Middle Aged, Social Environment, Sampling Studies, Nutrition Disorders, Calcium, Dietary, Cross-Sectional Studies, Lead, Risk Factors, Child, Preschool, Humans, Female, Child, Aged, Probability
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
