
pmid: 6648131
AbstractWe describe a new method of formulating stopping rules for clinical trials, one that incorporates opinion on what difference is clinically important. We compare the method with conventional group sequential designs and illustrate it by application to a study of Pancuronium Bromide for prevention of haemorrhage in pre‐term infants.
Clinical Trials as Topic, Therapeutic Equivalency, Research Design, Statistics as Topic, Infant, Newborn, Humans, Pancuronium, Vitamin K Deficiency Bleeding
Clinical Trials as Topic, Therapeutic Equivalency, Research Design, Statistics as Topic, Infant, Newborn, Humans, Pancuronium, Vitamin K Deficiency Bleeding
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
