
doi: 10.1002/sim.4404
pmid: 22052573
The spatial scan statistic has been widely used in spatial disease surveillance and spatial cluster detection for more than a decade. However, overdispersion often presents in real‐world data, causing not only violation of the Poisson assumption but also excessive type I errors or false alarms. In order to account for overdispersion, we extend the Poisson‐based spatial scan test to a quasi‐Poisson‐based test. The simulation shows that the proposed method can substantially reduce type I error probabilities in the presence of overdispersion. In a case study of infant mortality in Jiangxi, China, both tests detect a cluster; however, a secondary cluster is identified by only the Poisson‐based test. It is recommended that a cluster detected by the Poisson‐based scan test should be interpreted with caution when it is not confirmed by the quasi‐Poisson‐based test. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
China, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Population Surveillance, Infant Mortality, Cluster Analysis, Humans, Infant, Computer Simulation, Poisson Distribution
China, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Population Surveillance, Infant Mortality, Cluster Analysis, Humans, Infant, Computer Simulation, Poisson Distribution
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 31 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
