
doi: 10.1002/sim.3489
pmid: 19065625
AbstractSelecting an appropriate working correlation structure is pertinent to clustered data analysis using generalized estimating equations (GEE) because an inappropriate choice will lead to inefficient parameter estimation. We investigate the well‐known criterion of QIC for selecting a working correlation structure, and have found that performance of the QIC is deteriorated by a term that is theoretically independent of the correlation structures but has to be estimated with an error. This leads us to propose a correlation information criterion (CIC) that substantially improves the QIC performance. Extensive simulation studies indicate that the CIC has remarkable improvement in selecting the correct correlation structures. We also illustrate our findings using a data set from the Madras Longitudinal Schizophrenia Study. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
longitudinal data, model selection, Biometry, 330, selection, generalized estimating equations, working correlation structure, Cluster Analysis, clustered data, Computer Simulation, 2613 Statistics and Probability, gee analyses, correlation information, Likelihood Functions, Covariance, QIC, misspecification, criterion, error, Correlation information criterion, Clustered data, linear-models, correlation modelling, Correlation modelling, efficiency, covariance, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Regression Analysis, 2713 Epidemiology
longitudinal data, model selection, Biometry, 330, selection, generalized estimating equations, working correlation structure, Cluster Analysis, clustered data, Computer Simulation, 2613 Statistics and Probability, gee analyses, correlation information, Likelihood Functions, Covariance, QIC, misspecification, criterion, error, Correlation information criterion, Clustered data, linear-models, correlation modelling, Correlation modelling, efficiency, covariance, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Regression Analysis, 2713 Epidemiology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 135 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
