
doi: 10.1002/sim.3402
pmid: 18712779
AbstractWe describe a non‐parametric multiple imputation method that recovers the missing potential censoring information from competing risks failure times for the analysis of cumulative incidence functions. The method can be applied in the settings of stratified analyses, time‐varying covariates, weighted analysis of case‐cohort samples and clustered survival data analysis, where no current available methods can be readily implemented. The method uses a Kaplan–Meier imputation method for the censoring times to form an imputed data set, so cumulative incidence can be analyzed using techniques and software developed for ordinary right censored survival data. We discuss the methodology and show from both simulations and real data examples that the method yields valid estimates and performs well. The method can be easily implemented via available software with a minor programming requirement (for the imputation step). It provides a practical, alternative analysis tool for otherwise complicated analyses of cumulative incidence of competing risks data. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Likelihood Functions, Models, Statistical, Incidence, Breast Neoplasms, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Survival Analysis, Statistics, Nonparametric, Treatment Outcome, Risk Factors, Humans, Computer Simulation, Female, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Software, Proportional Hazards Models, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Likelihood Functions, Models, Statistical, Incidence, Breast Neoplasms, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Survival Analysis, Statistics, Nonparametric, Treatment Outcome, Risk Factors, Humans, Computer Simulation, Female, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Software, Proportional Hazards Models, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 65 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
