
doi: 10.1002/sim.1650
pmid: 15027075
AbstractThis paper investigates generalized estimating equations for association parameters, which are frequently of interest in family studies, with emphasis on covariance estimation. Separate link functions are used to connect the mean, the scale, and the correlation to linear predictors involving possibly different sets of covariates, and separate estimating equations are proposed for the three sets of parameters. Simulations show that the robust ‘sandwich’ variance estimator and the jackknife variance estimator for the correlation parameters are generally close to the empirical variance for the sample size of 50 clusters. The results contradict Ziegleret al. and Kastner and Ziegler, where the ‘sandwich’ estimator obtained from the software MAREG was shown to be unsuitable for practical usage. The problem appears to arise because the MAREG variance estimator does not account for variability in estimation of the scale parameters, but may be valid with fixed scale. We also find that the formula for the approximate jackknife variance estimator in Ziegleret al. is deficient, resulting in systematic deviations from the fully iterated jackknife variance estimator. A general jackknife formula is provided and performs well in numerical studies. Data from a study on the genetics of alcoholism is used to illustrate the importance of reliable variance estimation in biomedical applications. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Male, Models, Statistical, Models, Biological, Alcoholism, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Cluster Analysis, Humans, Female, Epidemiologic Methods
Male, Models, Statistical, Models, Biological, Alcoholism, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Cluster Analysis, Humans, Female, Epidemiologic Methods
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 448 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
