
doi: 10.1002/sim.1572
pmid: 14601017
AbstractWe generalize the well‐knownR2measure for linear regression to linear mixed effects models. Our work was motivated by a cluster‐randomized study conducted by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, to compare two different versions of informed consent document. We quantify the variation in the response that is explained by the covariates under the linear mixed model, and study three types of measures to estimate such quantities. The first type of measures make direct use of the estimated variances; the second type of measures use residual sums of squares in analogy to the linear regression; the third type of measures are based on the Kullback–Leibler information gain. All the measures can be easily obtained from software programs that fit linear mixed models. We study the performance of the measures through Monte Carlo simulations, and illustrate the usefulness of the measures on data sets. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bayes Theorem, Consent Forms, Linear Models, Schizophrenia, Cluster Analysis, Humans, Computer Simulation, Monte Carlo Method, Antipsychotic Agents, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Bayes Theorem, Consent Forms, Linear Models, Schizophrenia, Cluster Analysis, Humans, Computer Simulation, Monte Carlo Method, Antipsychotic Agents, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 473 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
