
doi: 10.1002/sim.1523
pmid: 12704606
AbstractIn this paper we provide both theoretical and empirical comparisons of marginal and conditional methods for analysing spatial count data. We focus on methods for spatial prediction developed from a generalized linear mixed model framework and compare them with the traditional linear (kriging) predictor. Prediction methods are illustrated and compared through a case study based on real data and through a detailed simulation study. The paper emphasizes a better understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of each approach. Published in 2003 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Scotland, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Small-Area Analysis, Lip Neoplasms, Linear Models, Humans, Computer Simulation, Epidemiologic Methods
Scotland, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Small-Area Analysis, Lip Neoplasms, Linear Models, Humans, Computer Simulation, Epidemiologic Methods
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
