
doi: 10.1002/sim.1385
pmid: 12520562
AbstractHypothesis testing of matched‐pair data has been adapted for equivalence (one‐ and two‐sided) study designs; however, a statistical problem arises when more than one measurement is recorded for each study subject. Ignoring the correlation between the repeated measurements per subject may underestimate the standard error of the parameter estimate. A method of testing for non‐inferiority or equivalence of clustered matched‐pair data is not yet available. This paper proposes a Wald‐type test statistic for a non‐inferiority hypothesis and applies it to the comparison of two diagnostic procedures. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon, Research Design, Hyperparathyroidism, Matched-Pair Analysis, Statistics as Topic, Humans, Computer Simulation, Sensitivity and Specificity, Tomography, Emission-Computed
Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon, Research Design, Hyperparathyroidism, Matched-Pair Analysis, Statistics as Topic, Humans, Computer Simulation, Sensitivity and Specificity, Tomography, Emission-Computed
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 20 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
