
doi: 10.1002/sim.1103
pmid: 12185891
AbstractAnalysis of variance (ANOVA) methods are usually applied to analyse continuous data from cross‐over studies. The analysis, however, may not have appropriate type I error when certain assumptions are violated. In this paper, we first clarify a conventionally minimum set of assumptions that validate the F‐tests of ANOVA models for cross‐over studies. We then provide a practical verification/remedy procedure based upon the theoretical developments. By applying the verification/remedy procedure, more robust analysis results can be expected from the ANOVA models. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Analysis of Variance, Cross-Over Studies, Models, Statistical, Humans, Blood Pressure, Antihypertensive Agents
Analysis of Variance, Cross-Over Studies, Models, Statistical, Humans, Blood Pressure, Antihypertensive Agents
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
