
doi: 10.1002/sim.10134
pmid: 38853711
Analysis of integrated data often requires record linkage in order to join together the data residing in separate sources. In case linkage errors cannot be avoided, due to the lack a unique identity key that can be used to link the records unequivocally, standard statistical techniques may produce misleading inference if the linked data are treated as if they were true observations. In this paper, we propose methods for categorical data analysis based on linked data that are not prepared by the analyst, such that neither the match‐key variables nor the unlinked records are available. The adjustment is based on the proportion of false links in the linked file and our approach allows the probabilities of correct linkage to vary across the records without requiring that one is able to estimate this probability for each individual record. It accommodates also the general situation where unmatched records that cannot possibly be correctly linked exist in all the sources. The proposed methods are studied by simulation and applied to real data.
Models, Statistical, 330, logistic regression, heterogeneous linkage error, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, linkage data structure, analysis of contingency table, Data Interpretation, Statistical, incomplete match space, Humans, Computer Simulation, Medical Record Linkage, secondary analysis, Probability
Models, Statistical, 330, logistic regression, heterogeneous linkage error, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, linkage data structure, analysis of contingency table, Data Interpretation, Statistical, incomplete match space, Humans, Computer Simulation, Medical Record Linkage, secondary analysis, Probability
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
