
doi: 10.1002/sam.11345
Sensitivity tests apply a range of stimulus values to experimental subjects and record binary responses in order to estimate the distribution of threshold values in the subject population, where thresholds delineate responses from nonresponses. In many applications, such as explosives engineering, individual tests are expensive and are conducted in small runs. Scarcity of data results in nonexistence of estimates, or estimates with low precision. We discuss various methods, such as combining test runs, covariate analysis, and penalized maximum likelihood, for enhancing precision and “mining more gold” from expensive test results.
sensitivity testing analysis, Statistics, penalized maximum likelihood, precision, probit, data mining, Computer science, logistic, binary regression
sensitivity testing analysis, Statistics, penalized maximum likelihood, precision, probit, data mining, Computer science, logistic, binary regression
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
