
arXiv: 1906.05127
AbstractThe basic random k‐SAT problem is: given a set of n Boolean variables, and m clauses of size k picked uniformly at random from the set of all such clauses on our variables, is the conjunction of these clauses satisfiable? Here we consider a variation of this problem where there is a bias towards variables occurring positive—that is, variables occur negated w.p. and positive otherwise—and study how the satisfiability threshold depends on p. For this model breaks many of the symmetries of the original random k‐SAT problem, for example, the distribution of satisfying assignments in the Boolean cube is no longer uniform. For any fixed k, we find the asymptotics of the threshold as p approaches 0 or . The former confirms earlier predictions based on numerical studies and heuristic methods from statistical physics.
Combinatorial probability, Probability in computer science (algorithm analysis, random structures, phase transitions, etc.), Discrete Mathematics, Computer Sciences, Computational aspects of satisfiability, random \(k\)-SAT, random constraint satisfaction problem, Probability (math.PR), combinatorial probability, Diskret matematik, random k-SAT, Datavetenskap (datalogi), phase transition, ombinatorial probability, FOS: Mathematics, Mathematics - Combinatorics, 60C05, Combinatorics (math.CO), QA, QC, Mathematics - Probability
Combinatorial probability, Probability in computer science (algorithm analysis, random structures, phase transitions, etc.), Discrete Mathematics, Computer Sciences, Computational aspects of satisfiability, random \(k\)-SAT, random constraint satisfaction problem, Probability (math.PR), combinatorial probability, Diskret matematik, random k-SAT, Datavetenskap (datalogi), phase transition, ombinatorial probability, FOS: Mathematics, Mathematics - Combinatorics, 60C05, Combinatorics (math.CO), QA, QC, Mathematics - Probability
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
