
arXiv: 0712.3507
AbstractWe give counterexamples and a few positive results related to several conjectures of R. Pemantle (Pemantle, J Math Phys 41 (2000), 1371–1390) and D. Wagner (Wagner, Ann Combin 12 (2008), 211–239) concerning negative correlation and log‐concavity properties for probability measures and relations between them. Most of the negative results have also been obtained, independently but somewhat earlier, by Borcea et al. (Borcea et al., J Am Math Soc 22 (2009), 521–567). We also give short proofs of a pair of results from (Pemantle, J Math Phys 41 (2000), 1371–1390) and (Borcea et al., J Am Math Soc 22 (2009), 521–567); prove that “almost exchangeable” measures satisfy the “Feder‐Mihail” property, thus providing a “non‐obvious” example of a class of measures for which this important property can be shown to hold; and mention some further questions. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Random Struct. Alg., 2010
Measures of association (correlation, canonical correlation, etc.), Feder-Mihail property, Probability (math.PR), 05A20, 05B35 (Secondary), 60C05 (Primary), correlation inequalities, Mason's conjecture, negative association, FOS: Mathematics, Inequalities; stochastic orderings, Mathematics - Combinatorics, 60C05 (Primary); 05A20, 05B35 (Secondary), Combinatorics (math.CO), Mathematics - Probability
Measures of association (correlation, canonical correlation, etc.), Feder-Mihail property, Probability (math.PR), 05A20, 05B35 (Secondary), 60C05 (Primary), correlation inequalities, Mason's conjecture, negative association, FOS: Mathematics, Inequalities; stochastic orderings, Mathematics - Combinatorics, 60C05 (Primary); 05A20, 05B35 (Secondary), Combinatorics (math.CO), Mathematics - Probability
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
