
arXiv: 0903.0328
AbstractOne of the main questions that arise when studying random and quasi‐random structures is which properties $ \cal P$ are such that any object that satisfies $ \cal P$ “behaves” like a truly random one. In the context of graphs, Chung, Graham, and Wilson (Combinatorica 9 (1989), 345–362) call a graph p‐quasi‐random if it satisfies a long list of the properties that hold in G(n,p) with high probability, such as edge distribution, spectral gap, cut size, and so on.Our main result here is that the following holds for any fixed graph H: if the distribution of induced copies of H in a graph G is close (in a well defined way) to the distribution we would expect to have in G(n,p), then G is either p‐quasi‐random or p̄‐quasi‐random, where p̄ is the unique nontrivial solution of the polynomial equation xδ(1 − x)1−δ = pδ(1 − p)1−δ, with δ being the edge density of H. We thus infer that having the correct distribution of induced copies of any single graph H is enough to guarantee that a graph has the properties of a random one. The proof techniques we develop here, which combine probabilistic, algebraic, and combinatorial tools, may be of independent interest to the study of quasi‐random structures. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Random Struct. Alg., 2010
induced subgraph, Random graphs (graph-theoretic aspects), FOS: Mathematics, Mathematics - Combinatorics, Combinatorics (math.CO), quasi-randomness, random graph
induced subgraph, Random graphs (graph-theoretic aspects), FOS: Mathematics, Mathematics - Combinatorics, Combinatorics (math.CO), quasi-randomness, random graph
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
