
doi: 10.1002/rnc.1246
AbstractChemical processes are often operated in a dynamic mode. This is always true by definition for the wide class of batch processes and it also holds for the transient phases of continuous processes, caused for example by load or grade changes. Nonlinear model‐predictive control (NMPC) is a powerful approach to deal with the complexity of the related nonlinear control problems aiming for economic optimization. One major element of any NMPC implementation is a dynamic optimization algorithm, which solves the underlying optimization problem efficiently to obtain the optimal control trajectory in real time. Applying nonlinear dynamic optimization to industrial process models results in high calculation times restricting the use of NMPC for most chemical processes. In a previous publication, a method has been presented, which provides the optimizer with a control grid specifically tailored to the problem and therefore facilitates the optimization. In this work, this method is adapted to the on‐line application in NMPC. In contrast to off‐line optimizations, uncertainties and a fixed discrete time sampling have to be taken into account. The approach is applied to a small example and considerable speed‐up is observed. The gain is expected to be even greater for large‐scale industrial problems. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
nonlinear model-predictive control, Adaptive control/observation systems, multiple shooting, necessary conditions of optimality, dynamic real-time optimization, Computational methods in systems theory, move blocking, single shooting
nonlinear model-predictive control, Adaptive control/observation systems, multiple shooting, necessary conditions of optimality, dynamic real-time optimization, Computational methods in systems theory, move blocking, single shooting
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
