
doi: 10.1002/rcs.2344
pmid: 34662926
AbstractBackgroundSenhance is novel robotic platform which can be used to perform radical prostatectomy (RP). We compare our results of robotic RP to similar patients operated with laparoscopic technique.Patients and methodsA prospective study of 61 patients operated laparoscopically and 107 patients operated using the Senhance robotic system. We have analysed operative and postoperative results in both groups.ResultsThere was no difference in the operative time, estimated blood loss, positive surgical margins, length of hospitalisation and catheterisation. There were 4 (6.5%) Clavien–Dindo grade I complications, and 5 (8.1%) late complications in laparoscopy. There were 6 (5.6%) Clavien–Dindo grade I, 3 (2.8%) grade II, 1 (0.9%) grade IV complications and 2 (1.9%) late complications in robotic group.ConclusionSenhance robot‐assisted RP is safe, feasible and offers good and comparable functional and oncological outcomes to laparoscopy. The transition to robotic surgery with a relatively fast learning curve can be done effectively for surgeons with previous laparoscopic experience.
Senhance, Male, Prostatectomy, Prostatic Neoplasms, prostate cancer, Senhance ; laparoscopic surgery ; prostate cancer ; radical prostatectomy ; robotic surgery., laparoscopic surgery, radical prostatectomy, Treatment Outcome, Robotic Surgical Procedures, robotic surgery., Humans, Laparoscopy, Prospective Studies
Senhance, Male, Prostatectomy, Prostatic Neoplasms, prostate cancer, Senhance ; laparoscopic surgery ; prostate cancer ; radical prostatectomy ; robotic surgery., laparoscopic surgery, radical prostatectomy, Treatment Outcome, Robotic Surgical Procedures, robotic surgery., Humans, Laparoscopy, Prospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 25 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
