
doi: 10.1002/rcs.2058
pmid: 31713318
AbstractBackgroundVarious techniques have been proposed in the literature for phase and tool recognition from laparoscopic videos. In comparison, research in multilabel annotation of still frames is limited.MethodsWe describe a framework for multilabel annotation of images extracted from laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) videos based on multi‐instance multiple‐label learning. The image is considered as a bag of features extracted from local regions after coarse segmentation. A method based on variational Bayesian gaussian mixture models (VBGMM) is proposed for bag representation. Three techniques based on different feature extraction and bag representation models are employed for comparison.ResultsFour anatomical structures (abdominal wall, gallbladder, fat, and liver bed) and a tool‐like object (specimen bag) were annotated in 482 images. Our method achieved the best performance on single label accuracy: 0.87 (highest) and 0.69 (lowest). Moreover, the performance was >20% higher in terms of four multilabel classification error metrics (one‐error, ranking‐loss, hamming‐loss, and coverage).ConclusionsOur approach provides an accurate and efficient image representation for multilabel classification of still images captured in LC.
Normal Distribution, Video Recording, Reproducibility of Results, Bayes Theorem, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Artificial Intelligence, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Cluster Analysis, Humans, Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopy, Algorithms
Normal Distribution, Video Recording, Reproducibility of Results, Bayes Theorem, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Artificial Intelligence, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Cluster Analysis, Humans, Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopy, Algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
