
doi: 10.1002/psc.2512
pmid: 23625525
Study of peptides adsorption on surfaces remains a current challenge in literature. A complementary approach, combining X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and time‐of‐flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF‐SIMS) was used to investigate the antimicrobial peptide nisin adsorption on hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces. The native low density polyethylene was used as hydrophobic support and it was grafted with acrylic acid to render it hydrophilic. XPS permitted to confirm nisin adsorption and to determine its amount on the surfaces. ToF‐SIMS permitted to identify the adsorbed bacteriocin type and to observe its distribution and orientation behavior on both types of surfaces. Nisin was more oriented by its hydrophobic side to the hydrophobic substrate and by its hydrophilic side to the outer layers of the adsorbed peptide, in contrast to what was observed on the hydrophilic substrate. A correlation was found between XPS and ToF‐SIMS results, the types of interactions on both surfaces and the observed antibacterial activity. Such interfacial studies are crucial for better understanding the peptides interactions and adsorption on surfaces and must be considered when setting up antimicrobial surfaces. Copyright © 2013 European Peptide Society and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Listeria, Surface Properties, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Structure-Activity Relationship, Polyethylene, [CHIM] Chemical Sciences, [CHIM]Chemical Sciences, Adsorption, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions, Nisin
Listeria, Surface Properties, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Structure-Activity Relationship, Polyethylene, [CHIM] Chemical Sciences, [CHIM]Chemical Sciences, Adsorption, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions, Nisin
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 32 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
