
doi: 10.1002/ps.1517
pmid: 18181145
AbstractGene flow from transgenic glyphosate‐resistant crops can result in the adventitious presence of the transgene, which may negatively impact markets. Gene flow can also produce glyphosate‐resistant plants that may interfere with weed management systems. The objective of this article is to review the gene flow literature as it pertains to glyphosate‐resistant crops. Gene flow is a natural phenomenon not unique to transgenic crops and can occur via pollen, seed and, in some cases, vegetative propagules. Gene flow via pollen can occur in all crops, even those that are considered to be self‐pollinated, because all have low levels of outcrossing. Gene flow via seed or vegetative propagules occurs when they are moved naturally or by humans during crop production and commercialization. There are many factors that influence gene flow; therefore, it is difficult to prevent or predict. Gene flow via pollen and seed from glyphosate‐resistant canola and creeping bentgrass fields has been documented. The adventitious presence of the transgene responsible for glyphosate resistance has been found in commercial seed lots of canola, corn and soybeans. In general, the glyphosate‐resistant trait is not considered to provide an ecological advantage. However, regulators should consider the examples of gene flow from glyphosate‐resistant crops when formulating rules for the release of crops with traits that could negatively impact the environment or human health. Copyright © 2008 Society of Chemical Industry
Crops, Agricultural, Gene Flow, Glyphosate, Herbicides, Glycine, Plants, Genetically Modified, Herbicide Resistance
Crops, Agricultural, Gene Flow, Glyphosate, Herbicides, Glycine, Plants, Genetically Modified, Herbicide Resistance
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 94 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
