
AbstractOne of the most widely applied protective systems, to reduce the effects of an explosion, is explosion pressure release (venting). There is a disadvantage to venting in that, with an explosion, there is considerable (fire) damage which can result in major repair costs and production losses. In addition there is a growing resistance against the venting of large flame jets and combustion products, because of environmental and safety issues.A good alternative to explosion venting is explosion suppression. If designed, installed and maintained properly, explosion venting is a reliable protective technique. The main obstacle to the widespread acceptance of suppression technology, apart from the initial investments, is the intensive maintenance, which can have considerable impact both on production costs and efficiency.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
