Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Pediatric Pulmonolog...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Pediatric Pulmonology
Article . 2006 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Measuring Exhaled Breath Condensates in Infants

Authors: Alexander, Moeller; Peter, Franklin; Graham L, Hall; Friedrich, Horak; Johannes H, Wildhaber; Stephen M, Stick;

Measuring Exhaled Breath Condensates in Infants

Abstract

There is growing interest in investigating compounds of exhaled breath condensates (EBC) as potential noninvasive markers of airways disease processes. Some of these markers have the potential to provide information on the early stages of disease. In this paper, we present a method for collecting EBC during both oral and nasal breathing in infants. Fifty-four infants (mean age, 13.3 months; range, 1-30 months) undergoing infant lung-function testing were recruited for this study. Breath condensates were collected during sedated sleep, using a custom-made collection device. Collections were made for 10 min during normal tidal breathing. Nasal measurements were attempted in all children by placing a face-mask over the nose and mouth and keeping the mouth closed. In 14 infants, oral measurements were made by placing a face-mask over the mouth only and occluding the nose. Condensates were collected successfully in all but one child. The collected volume ranged from 50-550 microl (mean +/- SD, 281.8 +/- 145.8 microl). The volume of EBC collected was correlated to age, length, weight, and minute ventilation. Significantly more EBC was collected during oral compared to nasal breathing (354.3 vs. 277.5 microl, P=0.03). There were no significant changes in heart rate, respiratory rate, or oxygen saturation during collection. The collection of EBC in young children and infants is feasible and safe, and the method used here allows the successful collection of reasonable amounts of exhaled condensate.

Keywords

Male, Mouth, Respiration, Respiratory Tract Diseases, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Forced Expiratory Flow Rates, Nasal Mucosa, Breath Tests, Child, Preschool, Humans, Female

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    49
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
49
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!