
doi: 10.1002/oby.23651
pmid: 36746769
AbstractObjectiveThis study aimed to develop cutoffs and the optimal combination for body fat indices for screening cardiometabolic risk (CMR) among the pediatric population.MethodsThis cross‐sectional study consisted of 8710 (50.3% boys) Chinese children aged 6 to 18 years. Body fat indices, including fat mass index (FMI), body fat percentage, trunk to leg fat ratio (TLR), and android to gynoid fat ratio, were derived from dual‐energy x‐ray absorptiometry scans. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the best combination and optimal cutoffs of body fat indices to identify CMR.ResultsCompared with anthropometry‐based obesity measures, i.e., BMI and waist circumference, the FMI + TLR combination presented statistically higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values for discriminating CMR and its clustering. The optimal overfat cutoffs of FMI and TLR were respectively determined at the 75th percentile in boys and at the 80th percentile of FMI and the 75th percentile of TLR in girls. Moreover, simplified thresholds derived from age‐group‐merged cutoffs showed similar performance as optimal cutoffs in detecting CMR.ConclusionsBoth the optimal and simplified overfat cutoffs were provided for the Chinese pediatric population. The use of FMI and TLR together allows for adequate screening of CMR and its clustering.
Male, Body Mass Index, Cross-Sectional Studies, Absorptiometry, Photon, Adipose Tissue, Cardiovascular Diseases, Body Composition, Humans, Female, Obesity, Child
Male, Body Mass Index, Cross-Sectional Studies, Absorptiometry, Photon, Adipose Tissue, Cardiovascular Diseases, Body Composition, Humans, Female, Obesity, Child
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
