
ObjectiveInternalized weight bias (IWB) has been associated with weight regain after intentional weight loss, but reliance on cross‐sectional data limits the understanding of this relationship. This study prospectively evaluated IWB as a predictor of weight change in a longitudinal observational study of successful weight‐loss maintainers.MethodsNational Weight Control Registry participants (maintained 13.6‐kg weight loss for ≥ 1 y) were asked to complete an online questionnaire including current weight and Weight Bias Internalization Scale‐Modified (WBIS‐M) at baseline and 12 months.ResultsAt baseline, 1,250 of 1,643 eligible individuals completed the baseline assessment (71% female; 94% white; mean age ± SD: 52 y ± 13.1; BMI: 27 ± 5.5). The average WBIS‐M score was 3.0 (± 1.3). Study completers (n = 862) reported 2.2% (± 7.8%) weight gain. Higher baseline IWB predicted weight gain among men (n = 254; t = −2.28; P = 0.02) but not women (n = 608; t = 1.22; P = 0.22). A one‐point reduction in WBIS‐M score at follow‐up was associated with a 3.0% weight loss.ConclusionsAmong weight‐loss maintainers, IWB may be a risk factor for weight gain among men. Weight loss at follow‐up was associated with reduced IWB in both men and women. Reliance on female‐only samples may limit our understanding of IWB and its implications for weight control.
Adult, Male, Middle Aged, Article, Bias, Surveys and Questionnaires, Weight Loss, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies
Adult, Male, Middle Aged, Article, Bias, Surveys and Questionnaires, Weight Loss, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 24 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
